IS IT WRONG TO BE A CRITIC?

Whenever some action of a Goverment is criticised most of the people says critics are always against development. They are further saying that whoever criticising are inable in exectuting and should come forward and realise the difficulties in implementing a project. Being Critics, Mr. Cho Ramaswamy and Dr. Subramanaian Swamy themselves are criticised by many.

Is it wrong to be a critic? Will it serve any purpose?

Do we have moral rights to criticise when we are not actively involved in governance?

Let us analyse that here .

U need not be a cricket player to defend or criticise about a Team. When u started voting u become a politician. we may not be part of a political party but we have 100% rights to be a critic.

When we are very much careful about our own direct expenses from pocket or family, shouldn't we have the same caring towards the public money which is got purely from our own taxes?

When we qurarrel with even our kith and kin because of their improper handling of funds, why should not criticise the Goverments when they are irresponsible?

Gone are days when leaders thought they can win elections without doing anything to public.. Now they are more aware as people and they could not imagine of coming again if they do wrong... So we people should spread both our dismay and appreciation whenever we can. We cant expect all to go and strike or participate in movements. And there is no need for that also.

Before Independence we didnt have freedom to speak or write . So it required huge public participation to evict the British Rule. There were so many leaders with whom people had undoubted faith hence they followed them wholeheartedly... Can we point any single politician like that today?

if criticism is not done, one can never see the other end of an issue...

So Let us participate in creating awareness in all matters and make everything open and known to all.

rgds,

Rams